Every year, parents walk into my office with pride and relief.
“My child is going to Harvard for a summer program.”
“We enrolled them in Stanford’s summer school — it was expensive, but it will help with admissions, right?”
And every year, I have to say something deeply uncomfortable — but necessary:
Most summer schools do absolutely nothing for university admissions.
Not because they are fake.
Not because they are illegal.
But because they are brilliantly marketed — and deeply misunderstood.
In today’s admissions environment, where top universities receive 100,000+ applications, admissions officers are not impressed by paid experiences. They are trained to filter them out.
This is where families lose lakhs — and years of strategic time.
The most dangerous assumption families make is this:
“If a summer program has a famous university name, it must be valuable.”
That assumption is wrong.
Universities run dozens of summer programs under their brand.
But admissions offices evaluate them very differently.
To understand why summer schools often fail students, you need to understand how admissions officers actually think.
These are the programs most students attend — and the ones parents spend the most money on.
They usually have:
No academic cut-off
No essays
No recommendations
No interviews
No selection ratio
No competition
If your child can pay, they can attend.
Admissions officers know this.
From an evaluation perspective, these programs signal privilege, not merit.
Thousands of students attend them every year. Admissions teams see them constantly — and discount them just as quickly.
These programs function as:
Academic tourism
Campus exposure
Paid classroom experiences
They are not achievements.
Universities ask one core question:
“What did this student earn?”
In open-enrollment programs, the answer is:
“A seat — by paying.”
That’s why these certificates rarely help — and sometimes even hurt — when overused.
Now comes the part most families never hear.
Some summer programs do carry weight — because they are selective.
These programs typically require:
Strong personal essays
Teacher recommendations
Academic transcripts
Portfolios or subject tests
Interviews
Limited seats
In other words, students must compete to get in.
That changes everything.
Harvard Secondary School Program (select tracks)
Stanford Pre-Collegiate Studies (competitive cohorts)
Columbia University’s selective academic institutes
NYU Tisch High School Summer Program
IE University’s selective summer courses
Certain research-based programs in Europe and Asia
Getting into these programs signals:
Intellectual seriousness
Academic readiness
Initiative beyond payment
These programs don’t guarantee admission — but they add credibility.
The most common mistake I see is not attending one open program — it’s stacking them.
Students do:
One summer at Harvard
One at Stanford
One at Oxford
One at NYU
Parents assume more certificates = stronger profile.
Admissions officers see something else:
A student who substituted strategy with spending.
I have reviewed thousands of applications over two decades.
A student who builds one serious project consistently beats:
Five paid summer schools
Ten certificates
Endless campus photos
Depth always beats decoration.
Here is what consistently differentiates admitted students:
Depth in a chosen subject
Independent research or inquiry
Original projects
Internships with responsibility
Recognised competitions
Work experience or applied learning
Community impact with continuity
Clear intellectual direction
These experiences tell universities:
“This student didn’t just attend something — they built something.”
Summer schools don’t get students in.
Skills do.
Consistency does.
Impact does.
Here is the most important mindset change:
Don’t chase the university name. Chase the selection process.
if a program is competitive, it counts.
If anyone can join, it doesn’t.
Admissions teams are not fooled by branding — they are trained to see through it.
Working with families for over two decades has shown me one thing:
Most students don’t need more programs — they need clarity.
That’s exactly where I step in.
When I evaluate a student, I’m not counting certificates. I’m assessing:
Their academic strengths
Their intellectual interests
Their long-term direction
What actually builds a compelling profile for their target universities
I help students:
Identify which summer programs are genuinely competitive
Avoid open-enrollment traps that waste money
Build projects, research, internships, and initiatives that show depth
Anyone can sign you up for a fancy program.
KGC ensures your time and effort actually move your application forward.
Only competitive, selective summer programs add value. Open-enrollment programs rarely help.
Only if the program has a selection process. Paying alone does not impress admissions officers.
Quality over quantity. One meaningful experience is better than multiple paid programs.
Research, internships, independent projects, competitions, and sustained community initiatives.
Overuse of paid programs without depth can make a profile look manufactured.
In today’s admissions landscape, universities are not asking:
“Where did you go?”
They are asking:
“What did you earn — and what did you build?”
That answer determines everything.
ASK OUR CHATBOT 
