Every year, headlines scream:
“MIT is #1 again.”
“Harvard drops to #3.”
And naturally, students and parents pay attention. Rankings appear simple, authoritative, and scientific. They give you a number — and numbers feel reliable.
But here’s the truth I share with every family I counsel:
Rankings don’t tell the whole story — not even close.
The #1 university may not be #1 for you.
Most ranking systems measure research, citations, and faculty prestige — not student experience, ROI, internships, job outcomes, affordability, safety, or campus culture.
If you're choosing a university based only on rankings, you’re making a decision with incomplete (and often misleading) information.
If you want my complete, step-by-step guide to choosing universities based on real indicators — program fit, ROI, employability, culture, scholarships, and long-term outcomes — Comment “Rankings” below.
Rankings feel like a shortcut. A quick “top 100 universities” list looks much easier than analysing 50+ factors.
But here’s why that shortcut often leads students in the wrong direction:
A university ranked #17 sounds better than one ranked #54.
But behind that number is a formula designed by the ranking company — not by educators, employers, or students.
Parents want to say,
“My child got into a top 20 university.”
But:
Your success doesn’t depend on a ranking — it depends on what you do with the opportunities you get.
Most systems heavily weigh:
Research output
Faculty citations
Academic reputation surveys
Endowment size
None of these reflect:
teaching quality
mental health support
internships
classroom experience
affordability
alumni mentorship
employability
And that’s where the problem begins.
Before you trust a ranking list, understand what it’s based on.
Heavily weighted toward:
Academic reputation (40%)
Employer reputation
Faculty-student ratio
International mix
Research output
Focuses on:
Research environment
Citations
International outlook
Industry income
Teaching environment
Prioritises:
Research productivity
Reputation surveys
Publications and citations
Graduation rates (for U.S. schools)
Notice anything?
All three systems are research-centric and reputation-centric.
They do not measure:
student happiness
internships
career outcomes
visa/immigration support
academic pressure
inclusivity
safety
networking quality
housing availability
value for money
When you choose a university for study abroad, these are the factors that affect your daily life, mental health, and future career — not the number next to the university name.
Let’s break this once and for all.
Multiple global employer surveys show:
60% of employers don’t prioritise university name.
Companies like Google, Deloitte, EY, Apple, and JP Morgan hire from hundreds of universities — not only the top 50.
Students with strong projects, internships, and communication skills outperform students with big brand names but weak portfolios.
Northeastern University (often lower in global rankings) has one of the best co-op programs in the world, resulting in exceptionally high job placement rates.
Compare that to a top 20 university where students graduate with:
no work experience
minimal career support
poor industry connections
Who do you think gets hired faster?
Here’s what rankings don’t account for:
A university may be:
Top 50 overall
but
Top 10 in Engineering and
Top 200 in Business.
Or vice versa.
Choosing based on overall ranking is like buying a car based on colour, not engine performance.
A top 30 university with zero scholarship may be a worse choice than a top 150 university offering 50–100% scholarships.
Your ROI matters more than your ranking.
Employers care about internship experience far more than the university brand.
Some mid-ranked schools have:
paid co-ops
industry-integrated coursework
major corporate partnerships
…all of which affect your job prospects far more than a ranking number.
Location often predicts employability more than ranking.
Examples:
Boston → Tech, biotech
London → Finance, consulting
Toronto → AI, data science
Los Angeles → Film, entertainment
Vancouver → Gaming, VFX
A top 200 university in Boston may be more advantageous for tech than a top 50 university in a remote town.
And these directly impact student success.
Rankings matter if:
you are doing a research-heavy master’s
you plan to pursue a PhD
you want to work in academia
you're applying to globally reputed institutions
program selectivity is high
Rankings matter a little if:
you need a broad reputation indicator
you’re comparing universities with similar offerings
Rankings don’t matter much if:
you want strong internships
you want good scholarships
you need a good ROI
you care about career outcomes
you’re studying business, tech, design, media, or social sciences
you want a supportive campus environment
This is the same evaluation process used at Karan Gupta Consulting to shortlist universities for students across 65+ countries.
Look at:
course modules
specialisations
labs & facilities
research centres
teaching quality
accreditation
Check:
internship opportunities
co-op programs
on-campus recruitment
alumni network
job placement percentage
Career support > ranking.
Calculate:
Tuition + living expenses
Scholarship opportunities
Graduate earnings
Payback period
A lower-ranked but more affordable university may offer higher ROI.
Because your job market depends on:
industry hubs
immigration rules
networking opportunities
safety
part-time work options
Ask:
Is the campus diverse?
Are there clubs I’d join?
How competitive vs collaborative is the environment?
How large are classes?
Students perform best when they feel they belong.
Especially important for Indian and global students:
visa support
orientation
mentorship
academic advisors
mental health services
The best insights come from people who’ve lived the experience.
Ask about:
workload
internships
culture
safety
professor quality
Student picks a top 40 university far from tech hubs → no internship access.
Another picks a top 200 school in Boston → multiple internships → top job offers.
Top 30 school → no co-op, limited corporate exposure.
Top 120 school → co-op placements at Deloitte, KPMG, PwC.
Guess who wins?
Top 50 university gives no aid.
Top 150 university gives 75% scholarship.
Savings = ₹30–40 lakhs.
ROI = significantly higher.
Rankings tap into:
social validation
fear of regret
comparison pressure
brand prestige
But prestige fades quickly when you’re struggling with:
poor mental health
financial pressure
lack of internships
limited support
What stays with you forever is your experience, your growth, and your skills.
Not always — but it often leads to:
overpaying for the same degree
ignoring better-fit universities
joining a program that doesn’t match your goals
missing large scholarship opportunities
ending up with fewer internships
burnout in overly competitive environments
Your job, your happiness, and your career do not depend on a ranking number.
Not as much as people think. Employers focus more on internships, portfolios, and skills.
No. Many mid-ranked schools offer better internships, ROI, and student support.
Not unless they fit your budget, goals, and program needs.
Each uses a different formula and weightage.
Yes for research-focused degrees. Less so for career-focused programs.
Not at all. Many such universities offer exceptional opportunities and outcomes.
Program strength, internships, cost, location, and campus culture.
Rankings can provide a broad sense of reputation — nothing more.
Your future will be shaped by:
the program you choose
the internships you complete
the skills you develop
the mentors you find
the environment you grow in